Legislature(2013 - 2014)
2014-04-17 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2014-04-17 House Journal Page 2547 HB 306 The following, which was advanced to third reading from the April 16, 2014, calendar (page 2486), was read the third time: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 306(FIN) "An Act relating to the review and administration of tax credit programs; requiring the Department of Revenue to report indirect expenditures; relating to the duties of state agencies; requiring the legislative finance division to analyze certain indirect expenditures; relating to lapse dates for appropriations for capital projects; repealing the insurance tax education credit, the income tax education credit, the veteran employment tax credit, the oil or gas producer education credit, the property tax education credit, the mining business education credit, the fisheries business education credit, the fisheries business tax credit for scholarship contributions, the fisheries business salmon product development 2014-04-17 House Journal Page 2548 tax credit, the fisheries business salmon utilization tax credit, the fisheries business landing tax credit for scholarship contributions, the fisheries resource landing tax credit for the fisheries resource harvested under the community development quota, the fisheries resource landing tax education credit, and the film production tax credit; and providing for an effective date." Representative Kawasaki moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 306(FIN) be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 1. Objection was heard and withdrawn. There being no further objection, it was so ordered. The Speaker stated that, without objection, CSHB 306(FIN) would be returned to second reading for all amendments. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representatives Kawasaki, Gruenberg, Tuck, and Gara: Page 7, line 12: Delete "AS 43.20.048;" Page 7, line 20: Delete "AS 43.77.040 is" Insert "AS 43.20.048 and AS 43.77.040 are" Representative Kawasaki moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Saddler objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 306(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 3 2014-04-17 House Journal Page 2549 Yeas: Costello, Drummond, Feige, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito III, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Tarr, Tuck Nays: Austerman, Chenault, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Higgins, Hughes, Isaacson, Johnson, Keller, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Nageak, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Thompson, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Absent: Edgmon, Holmes, Reinbold And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representatives Tuck and Gara: Page 1, line 12, following "quota," (title amendment): Insert "and" Page 2, line 1 (title amendment): Delete ", and the film production tax credit" Page 6, line 27: Delete "OR AS 43.98.030]" Insert "] or AS 43.98.030" Page 7, lines 9 - 10: Delete "OR AS 43.98.030]" Insert "] or AS 43.98.030" Page 7, line 12: Delete "AS 24.20.271(12)" Page 7, lines 13 - 14: Delete "AS 43.98.030; AS 44.25.100, 44.25.105, 44.25.110, 44.25.115, 44.25.120, 44.25.125, 44.25.130, 44.25.135, 44.25.140, 44.25.145, 44.25.150, 44.25.190;" Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative Thompson objected. 2014-04-17 House Journal Page 2550 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 306(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Costello, Drummond, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito III, Nageak, Tarr, Tuck Nays: Austerman, Chenault, Feige, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Higgins, Hughes, Isaacson, Johnson, Keller, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lynn, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Thompson, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Absent: Edgmon, Holmes, Millett And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. CSHB 306(FIN) was automatically in third reading. The question being: "Shall CSHB 306(FIN) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 306(FIN) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 39 NAYS: 1 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Chenault, Costello, Drummond, Edgmon, Feige, Foster, Gara, Gattis, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Hawker, Herron, Higgins, Holmes, Hughes, Isaacson, Johnson, Josephson, Kawasaki, Keller, Kito III, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Nays: Nageak And so, CSHB 306(FIN) passed the House. 2014-04-17 House Journal Page 2551 Representative Pruitt moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Johnson gave notice of reconsideration of the vote on CSHB 306(FIN).